maryam alizade; peyman afrasiab; mohammad reza yazdani; abdolmajid liaghat; Masoomeh Delbari
Abstract
In rice cultivation, mid-season and end-season drainage at harvest time are two important operations of water management which, respectively, increase yield and provide better conditions for harvesting rice. Due to the unique conditions of paddy fields of Guilan province, making decisions about ...
Read More
In rice cultivation, mid-season and end-season drainage at harvest time are two important operations of water management which, respectively, increase yield and provide better conditions for harvesting rice. Due to the unique conditions of paddy fields of Guilan province, making decisions about the spacing and depth of drains and proper equation to determine the drainage spacing in paddy field requires research on the mid-season and end-season drainage. Therefore, in this research, the efficiency of drains spacing (L) and depth (D) of subsurface drainage in controlling water table and also accuracy of the steady and non-steady equations were evaluated at mid-season and end-season drainage stages in Guilan’s rice fields. Drainage treatments included six conventional subsurface drainage systems with rice husk envelope including drainage system with drain depth of 0.8 m and drain spacing of 7.5 m (L7.5 D0.8), (L10 D0.8), (L15 D0.8), (L7.5 D1), (L10 D1), and (L15 D1). All drain lines were 40 m long and made of PVC corrugated pipes with a diameter of 125 mm. Results showed that subsurface drainage with spacing of 15 m and depth of 80 cm (due to the proper water table depth and higher yield) and subsurface drainage with distance of 10 m and depth of 80 cm (due to the highest resistance to pentrometer penetration and the lowest soil moisture content) are recommended as the best drainage treatment for mid-season and end-season drainage, respectively. Dagan, Hooghoudt and Bouwer & Van Schilfgaarde equations combined with Hooghoudt equation were suitable equations for determining drainage spacing at mid-season drainage stage. Hooghoudt, Kirkham, Dagan, Bouwer & Van Schilfgaarde equations combined with Hooghoudt equation and Glover-Dumm equation were selected as suitable formulas for determining the spacing of subsurface drains for end-season drainage.
m a; p a; m y; a l; m d
Abstract
A second crop in paddy fields has economic advantages resulting from the production of crops (canola, beans, garlic, triticale, soybean, etc.), Preparation of rice bed for mechanized harvesting, strengthening the economy of farmers’ families, increase the incentive for farmers to stay in the village, ...
Read More
A second crop in paddy fields has economic advantages resulting from the production of crops (canola, beans, garlic, triticale, soybean, etc.), Preparation of rice bed for mechanized harvesting, strengthening the economy of farmers’ families, increase the incentive for farmers to stay in the village, etc. Due to the inability of the existing surface drainage systems in rapid depletion of water from the root zone, conditions for planting a second crop in paddy fields is not suitable. This can be provided by installing subsurface drainage systems, which, in addition to creating more favorable conditions for planting and harvesting rice, allows cultivation of other crops in the wet season. This research was conducted to determine the appropriate space and depth of subsurface drainage in paddy fields in order to provide favorable conditions for planting a second crop. The experiment was laid out in one and a half hectares of paddy fields at Rice Research Institute of Iran in Guilan province, in 2014. Drainage treatments included: six conventional subsurface drainage systems with rice husk envelope including drainage system with different drain depth and spacing L7.5 D0.8, L10 D0.8, and L15 D0.8, L7.5 D1, L10 D1, and L15 D1, surface drainage, and the control (without drainage). All lines were 40 meters long and made of PVC corrugated pipes with a diameter of 125 mm. Rice husk was used as a covering around the pipe drain. The results showed that subsurface drainage spacing of 15 m had failed to lower the water table depth to an acceptable level and provided the conditions only for the cultivation of shallow-rooted plants such as dill, parsley, and leeks. Also, surface drainage could reduce the excess water in the soil by 22% compared to control. To provide suitable conditions for the cultivation of second crops such as canola and beans, subsurface drainage spacing of 7.5 and 10 m seemed effective. However, to avoid excessive drainages by 7.5 m spacing, subsurface drainage spacing of 10 m was selected as the best space at drainages stage, for a second crop. Furthermore, due to the lack of significant differences in water table depth between treatments L10D1 and L10D0.8,theywere identified as suitable drainage systems at 0.8 m depth.